|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
NOT
GUILTY DWI CASE EXAMPLE: OCTOBER 15, 2008
Driver charged with DWI after driving
the wrong way down a one way street…
DWI CASE EXAMPLE: A police officer on a DWI patrol stopped a driver for driving the wrong
way down a one way street. The officer
activated his blue lights and stopped the driver. The driver pulled to a stop normally and
showed the officer his license and registration. The officer smelled an odor of alcohol and
interrogated the driver about drinking.
The police officer then ordered the driver to perform a series of
roadside acrobatics known as “field sobriety tests”. The driver allegedly “failed” these
subjective tests and arrested the driver for DWI. At the police station, the driver chose to
give the police more evidence by blowing into the black rubber breath hose. The alleged result was a .13. Because
he cooperated and blew into the breath hose at the police station, the police
piled another charge on the driver: DWI per se.
This is a charge that drivers suffer when they blow into the breath hose
and get a reading of .08 or higher. After the arrest, the driver hired Attorney Stevens to
fight the DWI charge.
READ ON TO
SEE WHAT HAPPENED…
NOT GUILTY VERDICT AFTER DWI TRIAL: OCTOBER 15, 2008
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
Please note-this is an example of
the disposition of a recent
TRIAL: The state
produced the testimony of the police officer who arrested the driver and
administered the breath test. Attorney Stevens
objected to the alleged breath test result and successfully moved to exclude
any breath test evidence at the trial.
This caused the DWI per se charge to be dismissed at the close of the
state’s case. That left the “stand-up
DWI charge” to be determined. At the
conclusion of the trial, the driver was found NOT GUILTY.
RESULT: NOT
GUILTY ON DWI CHARGE!!!
http://www.byebyedwi.blogspot.com
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful
defense!!!
TODAY’S SCRIPTURE:
“But he who looks carefully into the faultless law,
the law of liberty, and is faithful to it and perseveres in looking into it,
being not a heedless listener who forgets but an active doer who obeys, he
shall be blessed in his doing.”
James 1:25.
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
www.1-800-dial-dui.com
Copyright 2008, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.